<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack&#8217;s Year-End Van Roundup!</title>
	<link>http://www.kukoda.com/2006/10/11/jacks-year-end-van-roundup/</link>
	<description>This way to hilarity.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.kukoda.com/2006/10/11/jacks-year-end-van-roundup/#comment-14688</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kukoda.com/2006/10/11/jacks-year-end-van-roundup/#comment-14688</guid>
					<description>You're right.  I'll have part 2 up shortly.  My apologies.  I assure you that &quot;year-end round-ups,&quot; particularly those pertaining to vans, are not something I take lightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right.  I&#8217;ll have part 2 up shortly.  My apologies.  I assure you that &#8220;year-end round-ups,&#8221; particularly those pertaining to vans, are not something I take lightly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kukoda.com/2006/10/11/jacks-year-end-van-roundup/#comment-14554</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kukoda.com/2006/10/11/jacks-year-end-van-roundup/#comment-14554</guid>
					<description>I am not claiming to be the ultimate source on these topics, but aren't three items required to constitute s &quot;year-end round-up&quot;, &quot;wrap-up&quot; or &quot;looking back&quot;?  You appear to be using that term a little liberally.  I think that you need to add another van or take down the article out of respect for your fellow writers.  A simple allusion to a &quot;part II&quot; just does not cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not claiming to be the ultimate source on these topics, but aren&#8217;t three items required to constitute s &#8220;year-end round-up&#8221;, &#8220;wrap-up&#8221; or &#8220;looking back&#8221;?  You appear to be using that term a little liberally.  I think that you need to add another van or take down the article out of respect for your fellow writers.  A simple allusion to a &#8220;part II&#8221; just does not cut it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
